Can a leader who uses but does not integrate the 1,9 and 9,1 styles be described as a 'benevolent dictator'?

A leader characterized as a 'benevolent dictator' typically exhibits a combination of strong decision-making authority along with a genuine concern for the well-being of others. In this context, the 1,9 style represents a focus on people over tasks, while the 9,1 style emphasizes task completion with little attention to team welfare. If a leader employs these styles individually without integrating them, they may demonstrate an authoritative approach to decision-making (reflective of the 9,1 style), coupled with moments of caring for their team (reflective of the 1,9 style). However, because they don't effectively blend these approaches, the leader's benevolence appears selective or inconsistent, embodying the essence of a benevolent dictator—motivated by a desire to lead for the good of the group but without collaboration or input from the team.

Ultimately, this designation is contingent on how the leader manages relationships and decisions, facilitating a level of trust and respect while still maintaining control. Their governing style can oscillate between authority and concern, leading to a dynamic that could accurately be described as benevolent dictatorship, provided the focus remains on upholding their perceived benevolence while leading with authority.